Yes, WeightWatchers members have raised claims that the company made it unnecessarily difficult to cancel their subscriptions. A proposed class action lawsuit alleges that WW International, which owns the WeightWatchers brand, violated California law by automatically renewing subscriptions without making it clear and simple how to stop the charges. One customer alleged they bought a three-month membership in January 2018 and were then automatically charged repeatedly for over 16 months—more than five times the original commitment period—before they could successfully cancel.
These cancellation complaints are part of a broader pattern of legal issues facing WeightWatchers. The company has faced multiple class actions and regulatory actions related to how it handles customer subscriptions, from aggressive auto-renewal practices to allegations of deceptive limited-time sales offers. The cancellation issue is particularly important because federal law requires that subscription services make it just as easy for customers to cancel as it was for them to sign up in the first place.
Table of Contents
- What Are the Main Cancellation Barrier Claims Against WeightWatchers?
- How Does the FTC Police Subscription Cancellation Practices?
- What Happened in the Auto-Renewal Class Action Against WeightWatchers?
- What Other Lawsuits Has WeightWatchers Faced Over Subscriptions?
- What Has the FTC Found Against WeightWatchers?
- What Are WeightWatchers’ Current Cancellation Options?
- What Should You Do If You Believe You Were Harmed by WeightWatchers?
What Are the Main Cancellation Barrier Claims Against WeightWatchers?
The proposed auto-renewal class action focuses on a specific legal violation in California. The claim is that WeightWatchers obtained payment card information and renewed subscriptions without clearly informing customers about the cancellation method before charging them. This matters because California’s auto-renewal law (part of the Automatic Renewal Law under Business & Professions Code § 17602) requires companies to make the cancellation process obvious and straightforward before customers are ever charged for a renewal.
The lawsuit centers on how the company handled the gap between what customers agreed to and what actually happened. A customer could sign up for a three-month term expecting their membership to end after that period, only to wake up weeks later with unexpected charges on their card. Even when customers tried to cancel, they may have encountered obstacles—phone lines that were hard to reach, online cancellation options that were not prominent, or requirements to contact customer service rather than canceling independently. The legal question is whether WeightWatchers made it as simple to cancel as it was to subscribe in the first place.
How Does the FTC Police Subscription Cancellation Practices?
The Federal Trade Commission enforces strict rules about how subscription services must operate, and WeightWatchers is not exempt from this oversight. The FTC’s Negative Option Rule requires that cancellation be made “at least as simple and easy as the process for becoming a subscriber.” This means if a customer can sign up with one click on a website, they cannot be forced to call a phone number to cancel. If they can sign up over the phone, cancellation cannot require visiting a physical location.
The rule also prohibits companies from using dark patterns or obstacles to make cancellation difficult. A company cannot, for example, hide the cancellation link on its website, require customers to jump through multiple screens of retention offers before they can cancel, or use “retention specialists” trained to pressure customers into staying. One limitation to remember: the FTC’s rules apply to the moment of cancellation request, not to billing disputes or refund requests that might come later. A customer who successfully cancels but was overcharged still has to pursue the overcharge separately, which is why a lawsuit alleging automatic repeated charges is more serious than just a cancellation issue.
What Happened in the Auto-Renewal Class Action Against WeightWatchers?
The auto-renewal lawsuit details one plaintiff’s specific experience to represent what allegedly happened to many other customers. The plaintiff purchased a three-month WeightWatchers membership subscription in January 2018. However, instead of the membership ending after three months, the subscription automatically renewed and the customer’s payment card was charged repeatedly—for a total of over 16 months of charges.
This example is important because it shows the compounding harm: the customer not only faced a cancellation barrier, but may have also been charged multiple times before discovering the problem. During those 16 months, the customer may not have actively used the WeightWatchers program or may have assumed the charges had stopped. By the time they realized what was happening, multiple months of membership had already been charged to their card. This scenario illustrates why the auto-renewal law exists: customers need protection not just from signing up unwillingly, but from continued charges that keep stacking up after they believe they have cancelled or after their initial commitment period has ended.
What Other Lawsuits Has WeightWatchers Faced Over Subscriptions?
In April 2025, two California women filed a different kind of class action lawsuit against WeightWatchers, alleging that the company created fake limited-time sales offers to trick customers into signing up for multi-month memberships. Instead of offering genuine promotional discounts, the company allegedly used fake urgency and fake deadlines to push customers into longer commitments. This is distinct from the cancellation barrier issue, but it reveals a pattern: the company allegedly used deceptive tactics both to get customers to sign up and to keep them subscribed.
The difference between the two lawsuits matters for understanding WeightWatchers’ alleged practices as a whole. The cancellation barrier lawsuit targets what happens after signup, while the fake sales lawsuit targets the signup moment itself. Together, they suggest a comprehensive strategy to lock customers into longer and more expensive commitments than they would otherwise choose. A customer who was deceived at signup and then faced barriers to cancellation has two separate claims: one about the initial deception and one about the difficulty getting out.
What Has the FTC Found Against WeightWatchers?
The FTC has taken multiple enforcement actions against WW International, the parent company of WeightWatchers. In 2022, the FTC settled a case against WW International and its subsidiary Kurbo, Inc. for illegally collecting sensitive health data from children as young as 8 years old without getting proper parental consent. The FTC found that the company harvested detailed information about children’s weight, health conditions, and eating habits and then used that data to build algorithms.
The settlement required the company to pay $1.5 million in penalty and to delete all the illegally collected information about children. This enforcement action shows that the FTC is actively monitoring WeightWatchers’ practices across multiple areas. The children’s data case and the cancellation barrier lawsuits are not connected, but they both demonstrate concerns about how the company handles customer information and subscriptions. One important limitation: the FTC’s 2022 settlement was specifically about children’s data, not about adult cancellation practices. However, the existence of this previous enforcement action may give regulators and courts more skepticism toward WeightWatchers’ overall business practices.
What Are WeightWatchers’ Current Cancellation Options?
According to WeightWatchers’ terms and policies, members may cancel their memberships by selecting the cancellation option in their account, by contacting customer service, or through other means that the company provides. The company does not claim that phone calls are the only way to cancel. However, the existence of a stated policy does not automatically mean the policy is easy to find or use in practice. The cancellation barrier lawsuits allege that the gap between the stated policy and the actual user experience was the problem.
To cancel through WeightWatchers’ website, a member should log in to their account, look for settings or account management options, and find the subscription or cancellation section. If that process is not obvious, calling customer service is listed as an option. The advantage of the online method is that it creates a record (you can see the cancellation request happen in real time), while a phone call requires you to remember the date and details. The downside is that if the online option is buried or doesn’t work, you may not discover the problem until you see another charge on your card.
What Should You Do If You Believe You Were Harmed by WeightWatchers?
If you believe you experienced cancellation difficulties with WeightWatchers, or if you were automatically charged after trying to cancel, you should gather documentation of the charges. Print or save copies of your credit card or bank statements showing the dates and amounts of WeightWatchers charges. Save any emails or messages you sent attempting to cancel, and note the dates you contacted customer service or tried to cancel online.
You may also want to check whether you are eligible to join one of the existing class action lawsuits against WeightWatchers. If the auto-renewal lawsuit settles, there will be a settlement website where you can check your eligibility and submit a claim—watch for court notices or news from law firms handling the case. In the meantime, contact your credit card company or bank if you were overcharged, as your financial institution can sometimes reverse unauthorized recurring charges. If you had a legitimate cancellation request that was not honored, that dispute can sometimes be resolved through a chargeback or through WeightWatchers’ customer service escalation process, independent of any class action lawsuit.
You Might Also Like
- Planet Fitness Cancellation Class Action Claims Members Faced Barriers to Ending Memberships
- SiriusXM Cancellation Class Action Claims Subscribers Faced Illegal Retention Practices
- Peloton Subscription Class Action Claims Members Were Charged After Cancelling
Open Settlements You Can Claim Now
Browse current class action settlements accepting claims — several require no proof of purchase: