The Hubbard v. NCAA $200 million settlement represents a landmark victory for college athletes seeking compensation for Academic Achievement Awards they were prevented from receiving. Named after Chuba Hubbard, a former Oklahoma State University football player, and co-plaintiff Keira McCarrell, a former University of Oregon and Auburn University track and field athlete, this class action settlement challenges the NCAA and Power Five Conferences’ longstanding prohibition on what are essentially education-related bonuses that schools want to pay their athletes.
The lawsuit alleges that these organizations unlawfully prevented Division I athletes from receiving direct financial rewards tied to academic performance and achievements—benefits that schools were willing to provide but the NCAA rules forbade. At its core, this case is about reimbursing college athletes for money they should have been paid between April 1, 2019 and September 15, 2024. The settlement fund of $200 million will be divided among all eligible Division I athletes who competed during this window and would have qualified for Academic Achievement Awards under their school’s own criteria. This is distinct from name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals or other forms of athlete compensation—it specifically addresses the gap between what schools wanted to pay for academic performance and what NCAA rules allowed them to actually distribute.
Table of Contents
- What Is the Hubbard v. NCAA Settlement and Academic Achievement Awards?
- Who Is Eligible for the $200 Million Settlement?
- Timeline and Court Approvals in the Hubbard Case
- How to File a Claim Before the January 31, 2025 Deadline
- The Current Status and Appeal Challenges Delaying Payments
- What Academic Achievement Awards Are and Why They Matter
- What Happens Next and Future Outlook
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Is the Hubbard v. NCAA Settlement and Academic Achievement Awards?
The Hubbard settlement stems from a fundamental conflict between NCAA rules and university practices. Academic Achievement Awards are financial rewards that schools use to incentivize and recognize athletic performance linked to educational milestones. These can include signing bonuses, retention bonuses, graduation incentives, or direct payments based on grade point average, academic awards won by athletes, or degree completion. For decades, the NCAA prohibited schools from offering these awards directly to athletes, even though the schools themselves had budgeted for and wanted to provide them. The case argues this prohibition was an unlawful restraint on trade that deprived athletes of compensation they were entitled to receive. The NCAA’s historical position was that athletic scholarships were sufficient compensation and that additional academic rewards would blur the line between scholarships and payment for athletic services.
However, the Alston case (the Supreme Court decision that contributed to opening college athletics to NIL), combined with this lawsuit, challenged that justification. Chuba Hubbard became the named plaintiff for this action specifically because he was prevented from receiving Academic Achievement Awards during his time at Oklahoma State, even though the university had policies in place to provide them to football players who met academic benchmarks. His case represents thousands of athletes in similar situations across college sports. What makes this settlement unique is that it’s not arguing athletes should be paid for playing sports—it’s arguing they should be allowed to receive the specific educational incentives their schools want to offer them. Compare this to NIL deals, where athletes monetize their personal brand; these Academic Achievement Awards are direct institutional payments for meeting academic criteria. The settlement’s definition of eligible awards is intentionally narrow to focus specifically on education-related benefits, not athletic performance bonuses or other compensation.
Who Is Eligible for the $200 Million Settlement?
To qualify for a payment from the Hubbard settlement, you must have been a current or former Division I college athlete who competed on an NCAA Division I athletic team at any point between April 1, 2019 and September 15, 2024, and you must have met the requirements for receiving an Academic Achievement Award under your school‘s criteria during that time. This means you don’t necessarily have to have actually received the award—you need to have been eligible for it according to your institution’s Academic Achievement Award program rules. An athlete who graduated with a 3.8 GPA and won academic honors at a university that had an Academic Achievement Award program would likely qualify, even if the NCAA rules at the time prevented the school from actually paying out those awards. The class includes athletes from all 50 states and US territories, covering all NCAA Division I sports from football and basketball to swimming, golf, gymnastics, and more. A female soccer player at an ACC school who was eligible for an Academic Achievement Award based on maintaining a 3.5 GPA or higher would be part of the class. A male track athlete at a Big Ten institution who met his school’s criteria for academic excellence bonuses would also qualify.
The settlement is broad in its inclusion—essentially, if your school had an Academic Achievement Award program and you met its criteria, you’re likely eligible. The key limitation is the time window: the settlement only covers the period from April 1, 2019 through September 15, 2024. Athletes who graduated before April 2019 or began their college careers after September 15, 2024 are not eligible, even if they otherwise would have qualified. one important warning: determining eligibility requires understanding your specific school’s Academic Achievement Award criteria, which may not be easy to locate if those programs were defunct or dormant during the relevant period. Schools are required to provide documentation of these programs as part of the settlement process, but athletes will need to gather their own academic records and proof of meeting the criteria. If you attended a school that didn’t formally have a documented Academic Achievement Award program, you likely won’t qualify—this is a significant limitation of the settlement’s scope.
Timeline and Court Approvals in the Hubbard Case
The Hubbard settlement has moved through the court system in distinct phases. Preliminary approval was granted on October 7, 2024, which allowed the settlement to move forward and permitted the claims administration process to begin. This preliminary approval meant the court tentatively found the settlement fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the class. However, preliminary approval does not mean the settlement is final or that payment distributions are imminent—it’s a green light for the claims process while the court conducts further review. The final approval hearing took place on April 7, 2025, where the judge heard arguments from the settlement’s supporters, the defendants, and any objectors to the proposed distribution plan and settlement terms. This hearing is critical because it’s where the court makes its final determination about whether the settlement should be approved and whether the administration plan is appropriate. On June 6, 2025, the court issued its final approval order—though notably, this approval came with required modifications.
These modifications may have addressed concerns raised during the final hearing or adjustments needed to ensure fair administration of the settlement fund. A major complication in the timeline is the appeal situation. As of the most recent updates, seven separate appeals have been filed by different groups of athletes challenging various aspects of the settlement. These appeals are not frivolous objections—they represent substantive disagreements about the settlement’s fairness, the adequacy of the settlement fund, or the administration procedures. For example, some athletes might argue that $200 million is insufficient given the total number of eligible class members, or that the claims process is too restrictive. Until these appeals are resolved, distribution of settlement funds remains on hold. There is no current target date for when payments will actually begin, which means eligible athletes need to be prepared for a potentially extended waiting period.
How to File a Claim Before the January 31, 2025 Deadline
The claim filing deadline for the Hubbard settlement is January 31, 2025. This is a firm deadline, and missing it will result in forfeiture of your right to receive any settlement payment—no exceptions are typically made for late claims except in extraordinary circumstances. If you believe you’re eligible, you need to act immediately, as this deadline may have already passed depending on when you’re reading this article. An athlete who meets the eligibility criteria but fails to submit a claim before the deadline will receive nothing from the settlement, even if every other requirement is met. To file a claim, you’ll typically need to provide documentation proving your eligibility. This includes proof of enrollment and athletic participation at a Division I school during the relevant time period (which your school’s records should verify), your academic records showing you met your school’s Academic Achievement Award criteria, and potentially information about what Academic Achievement Awards your specific institution offered. The claims process usually involves submitting a form through a claims administrator’s website, though some settlements also allow paper claims for those without internet access.
You’ll need your social Security number, banking information for direct deposit of any payment, and contact information. The most critical documentation is proof that you actually met your school’s Academic Achievement Award criteria—if you can’t demonstrate this, your claim will be denied. A key limitation of this process is that it requires claimants to be their own historians and documentarians. Your school may have reorganized, renamed programs, changed criteria, or moved records around since 2019. If your institution’s Academic Achievement Award program was not well-documented or has been discontinued, gathering proof may be difficult. Some athletes may not remember whether they met the academic thresholds, or may not have kept transcripts or academic records from college. The settlement’s administrators are not responsible for investigating every school’s historical Academic Achievement Award programs—they rely on claimants to provide evidence. This means the burden falls on athletes to be proactive, organized, and thorough in documentation.
The Current Status and Appeal Challenges Delaying Payments
As of now, the Hubbard settlement is in a holding pattern. Despite final court approval in June 2025, distribution of the $200 million settlement fund has not begun because multiple groups of athletes have filed appeals challenging different aspects of the settlement. This is a critical status update: eligible class members who have filed valid claims are waiting for these appeals to be resolved before receiving any money. There is currently no announced date for when distributions will begin. The appeals come from various factions within the class of athletes. Some athletes may be challenging the settlement amount, arguing that $200 million is inadequate compensation given the number of eligible class members and the years of lost compensation.
Others may be contesting the claims methodology, arguing that the process for proving eligibility is too strict or that certain athletes are being unfairly excluded. Still others may dispute how the settlement fund should be allocated among class members. These aren’t mere quibbles—they represent genuine legal disputes about whether the settlement adequately compensates the class, which is why courts take them seriously and delay distribution pending appeal resolution. The practical consequence of these appeals is uncertainty and delay. Athletes who filed claims and believe they’ll receive settlement payments may be waiting months or even years for the actual distribution to occur. This is a significant limitation of the settlement that should not be ignored—it’s not a case where approved claimants will receive money within weeks of final approval. If you have pending financial plans that depend on receiving your share of this settlement, you should factor in the likelihood of continued delays due to the appeals process.
What Academic Achievement Awards Are and Why They Matter
Academic Achievement Awards represent a specific category of college athlete compensation that exists in the gray area between athletic scholarships and NIL deals. These are direct payments made by schools to athletes based on meeting academic benchmarks. For example, a university might have had a program offering football players a $5,000 bonus for maintaining a 3.5 GPA or higher, or a $10,000 graduation bonus for receivers or running backs who completed their degrees. Women’s basketball programs might offer $3,000 annual payments to players who earned Dean’s List status. These aren’t arbitrary amounts—they’re built into institutional budgets and represent official university policy on how schools value athlete education and academic success.
The significance of Academic Achievement Awards is that they create an incentive structure that aligns athletic participation with educational outcomes. By offering direct financial rewards for academic achievement, schools signal that they prioritize education alongside athletics. During the years covered by this settlement (2019-2024), NCAA rules prevented schools from offering these awards in many cases, even though the schools had the money and the motivation to do so. This meant athletes missed out on compensation they were entitled to under their institutions’ own policies. A defensive lineman at a Power Five school who graduated summa cum laude and met all criteria for an Academic Achievement Award program may have been entitled to receive $15,000 under the school’s policy, but NCAA rules prevented that payout. The settlement seeks to compensate for precisely these lost payments.
What Happens Next and Future Outlook
The immediate future of the Hubbard settlement depends on resolution of the pending appeals. The NCAA and Power Five Conferences have limited options at this point—the settlement has been approved by the court, and the defendants are bound by that approval unless an appeals court overturns it (which is unlikely given the strength of the class’s claims). The most likely scenarios are that appeals are either resolved quickly with minor modifications to the settlement administration, or they extend the timeline significantly while appellate courts review the arguments.
Looking ahead, this settlement may have broader implications for how the NCAA and conferences approach athlete compensation rules. If a $200 million settlement is required to resolve a dispute over Academic Achievement Awards, it signals that courts view these restrictions as serious legal violations. Future NCAA policies on athlete compensation may be shaped by this precedent, potentially leading to more permissive rules around educational incentives and payments. The Hubbard case, along with other recent litigation and legislative changes, is fundamentally shifting the landscape of college athlete compensation, and this settlement is one significant milestone in that broader transformation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the Hubbard settlement and NIL deals?
The Hubbard settlement specifically addresses Academic Achievement Awards—direct institutional payments for meeting academic criteria. NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals are separate arrangements where athletes monetize their personal brand and likeness. These are fundamentally different types of compensation.
If I graduated before April 1, 2019, am I eligible?
No. The settlement only covers athletes who competed during the April 1, 2019 through September 15, 2024 window. Athletes who completed their eligibility before April 2019 are not part of the class, even if their school had Academic Achievement Award programs.
How much money will each athlete receive?
The settlement fund is $200 million total, but the per-athlete amount depends on how many eligible claims are filed and approved. If 100,000 athletes file valid claims, the average might be $2,000 per person, but this is only an estimate and actual amounts may be higher or lower. The settlement does not specify equal distributions.
What if my school doesn’t have records of its Academic Achievement Award program?
The settlement requires schools to provide documentation of their Academic Achievement Award programs and criteria. If your school cannot provide records, the claims administrator may deny your claim. You should attempt to obtain these records directly from your university’s athletics compliance or financial aid offices.
When will I actually receive my settlement payment?
As of now, distribution has not begun due to pending appeals. There is no announced date for when payments will start. Appeals could take months or years to resolve, so you should not rely on receiving settlement funds on any specific timeline.
Can I get help filing my claim from a third-party company?
You can file your claim directly through the official claims administrator at no cost. Be wary of companies offering to file claims for you in exchange for fees—this is unnecessary and may reduce your recovery. The claims process is designed to be accessible directly to class members.
You Might Also Like
- Tri Counties Bank $1.185 Million Data Breach Class Action Settlement
- Target $2.225 Million Washington Wage Disclosure Violation Class Action Settlement
- Seroquel XR $5.475 Million Pharmaceutical Class Action Settlement
Open Settlements You Can Claim Now
Browse current class action settlements accepting claims — several require no proof of purchase: