A class action lawsuit filed against Vidant Health, now known as ECU Health, has brought national attention to the staggering markups hospitals apply to CT scans through their chargemasters — the internal price lists that most patients never see until a bill arrives. While the specific claim of 30 times the Medicare allowable rate captures the scale of the problem, a landmark 2016 study published in Health Affairs found that CT scan departments carry the highest charge-to-cost ratio of any hospital department at 28.5, meaning a hospital with $100 in actual CT costs charges patients $2,850. In the Vidant case, plaintiff George Cansler visited Vidant Chowan Hospital in Edenton, North Carolina in 2018 for a kidney stone and was billed $3,119 for a CT scan after his insurance had already paid $456 — roughly 11 times the Medicare rate of approximately $300 for that same scan. These chargemaster markups are not abstract accounting figures.
They determine what uninsured patients owe in full, what insured patients pay toward deductibles and coinsurance, and what hospitals pursue through debt collectors when bills go unpaid. The Vidant lawsuit, filed February 18, 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina by the law firm Wallace and Graham, alleges the hospital system used hidden prices and then deployed aggressive and illegal debt collection tactics through its vendor FirstPoint.
Table of Contents
- Why Are Hospitals Pricing CT Scans at Up to 28.5 Times Cost Through Their Chargemasters?
- What the Vidant Health Lawsuit Reveals About Chargemaster Abuse
- How Radiology Markups Compare Across Different Hospital Services
- What Patients Can Do When Facing Inflated CT Scan Bills
- Why Price Transparency Rules Have Not Yet Solved the Problem
- The Legal Theories Behind Chargemaster Class Actions
- Where Hospital Pricing Litigation Is Headed
- Frequently Asked Questions
Why Are Hospitals Pricing CT Scans at Up to 28.5 Times Cost Through Their Chargemasters?
The chargemaster is a hospital’s master list of prices for every billable item and service, from a single aspirin to a complex surgical procedure. Unlike most industries where prices bear a recognizable relationship to costs, hospital chargemasters have drifted into territory that researchers and courts are increasingly calling exploitative. The Health Affairs study by Bai and Anderson, using 2013 data, found that hospitals charged more than 20 times their Medicare-allowable costs in CT scan and anesthesiology departments — the two highest-markup departments in the entire hospital. CT scans topped the list because the equipment costs are largely fixed, the marginal cost of each scan is relatively low, and the chargemaster prices were set years ago and have been ratcheted upward without any market discipline.
The profit motive plays a measurable role. For-profit hospitals had an average charge-to-cost ratio of 6.31 across all departments, compared to 3.79 for nonprofit hospitals and 3.47 for government hospitals. The study also found that a one-unit increase in the charge-to-cost ratio was associated with $64 higher patient care revenue per adjusted discharge — confirming that these markups are not just theoretical numbers on a spreadsheet but translate directly into revenue extraction from patients and insurers. The CT scan department, with its 28.5 ratio, represents the most extreme version of a system-wide pattern.
What the Vidant Health Lawsuit Reveals About Chargemaster Abuse
The Vidant Health class action puts specific dollar figures on what might otherwise remain an academic debate about hospital pricing. Across Vidant’s hospital system, chargemaster prices for pelvic CT scans varied from $1,727 to $4,996 in 2021, while the Medicare reimbursement for the same scans was just $315. That means patients at the most expensive Vidant facility were being charged nearly 16 times the Medicare rate for an identical scan. The variation within a single hospital system is itself telling — it suggests that chargemaster prices are not driven by differences in the cost of delivering care but by what each facility believes it can collect. The lawsuit goes beyond sticker shock, however.
It alleges that Vidant’s billing practices were deceptive because patients had no meaningful way to learn the price of a CT scan before receiving one. After the inflated bills were generated, the complaint alleges, Vidant used its collection vendor FirstPoint to pursue patients with aggressive and illegal debt collection tactics. This combination — hidden prices, extreme markups, and coercive collection — forms the core legal theory. It is worth noting, however, that chargemaster prices do not always reflect what a patient actually pays. Insured patients typically pay rates negotiated between their insurer and the hospital, which are lower than chargemaster rates. The patients most exposed to full chargemaster pricing are the uninsured, the underinsured, and those who receive out-of-network care — often the people least able to absorb a $3,119 bill for a scan that Medicare values at $300.
How Radiology Markups Compare Across Different Hospital Services
CT scans may carry the worst chargemaster markups, but they are part of a broader pattern across radiology departments. A 2021 Johns Hopkins study examined hospital prices for radiological services compared to Medicare rates and found significant variation by modality. Head CT scans without contrast were priced at 5.9 times the Medicare rate — the highest markup among the imaging categories studied. Mammography, at the low end, was still 2.2 times the Medicare rate.
These are commercial insurer-negotiated rates, not chargemaster list prices, which means the actual billed prices for uninsured patients can be substantially higher. The gap between what commercial insurers pay and what Medicare pays has been widening. Data cited by Healthcare Finance News shows that commercial insurers paid hospitals 247 percent of Medicare rates on average in 2018. For patients, this means that even having insurance does not guarantee a reasonable price — it simply means the markup is negotiated rather than unilateral. The practical result is a pricing system where the same CT scan performed on the same machine by the same technologist can generate bills ranging from $300 to nearly $5,000 depending on who is paying and what agreement, if any, governs the price.
What Patients Can Do When Facing Inflated CT Scan Bills
Patients who receive a CT scan bill that appears grossly inflated have several concrete options, though none of them are simple. The first step is to request an itemized bill and compare each charge against the Medicare reimbursement rate for the same procedure code, which is publicly available through the CMS website. If the chargemaster price is 10 or 15 times the Medicare rate, that comparison alone provides use for negotiation. Many hospitals have financial assistance programs or charity care policies that can reduce or eliminate bills for patients who qualify, but hospitals are not always forthcoming about these programs.
The tradeoff patients face is between negotiating individually and waiting for class action litigation to produce a broader remedy. Individual negotiation can produce faster results — hospitals will often accept a fraction of the chargemaster price rather than pursue costly collections — but it requires the patient to advocate aggressively on their own behalf. Class action lawsuits like the Vidant case can produce systemic change and compensation for large groups of patients, but they take years to resolve and the individual payout may be modest. Patients with bills currently in collections should also be aware that debt collectors are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and overly aggressive tactics may themselves be actionable, as the Vidant lawsuit alleges regarding FirstPoint.
Why Price Transparency Rules Have Not Yet Solved the Problem
Federal price transparency regulations were supposed to bring chargemaster prices into the open. CMS rules require hospitals to publish machine-readable files listing all of their charges, and a federal judge upheld the rule against legal challenges from the hospital industry. In theory, this means patients can now look up the chargemaster price of a CT scan before receiving one. In practice, compliance has been uneven and the data is often published in formats that are technically accessible but practically unusable for ordinary consumers.
The latest complication is that enforcement of finalized revisions to the hospital price transparency rules has been delayed until April 1, 2026. This means hospitals that have been slow to comply or that publish incomplete data face limited consequences in the near term. Even where data is available, knowing that a hospital’s chargemaster price for a CT scan is $4,996 is only useful if the patient has an alternative — and in many communities, particularly rural areas like those served by Vidant’s hospitals in eastern North Carolina, there is no competing facility within a reasonable distance. Transparency without competition does not automatically produce lower prices.
The Legal Theories Behind Chargemaster Class Actions
The Vidant lawsuit and similar cases typically rely on state consumer protection statutes, common law theories of unconscionability, and claims of deceptive trade practices. The core argument is that chargemaster prices are not the product of any legitimate market process — patients do not agree to them in advance, cannot comparison shop during medical emergencies, and often do not learn the price until weeks after receiving care.
Courts have been receptive to some of these arguments, particularly when hospitals combine high markups with aggressive collection efforts. The challenge for plaintiffs is that hospitals have broad discretion to set their own prices, and courts are generally reluctant to become price regulators. The cases that gain the most traction tend to involve the most extreme markups and the most sympathetic facts — an uninsured patient charged $3,119 for a scan that costs $300 under Medicare being a strong example.
Where Hospital Pricing Litigation Is Headed
The combination of high-profile lawsuits, academic research documenting extreme markups, and incomplete price transparency regulation suggests that chargemaster litigation will continue to expand. As more hospital pricing data becomes publicly available — particularly after the April 2026 enforcement deadline for transparency rule revisions — plaintiffs’ attorneys will have better tools to identify the most egregious pricing outliers and build class action cases around them.
The fundamental tension is between hospitals that argue chargemaster prices are irrelevant because most patients pay negotiated rates, and patients who can demonstrate that they were actually billed and collected upon at chargemaster prices far exceeding any reasonable measure of cost. Until that tension is resolved, either through legislation, regulation, or a definitive court ruling, patients and their attorneys will continue to use class action litigation as one of the few available mechanisms to challenge pricing practices that can turn a $300 medical service into a $3,000 or $5,000 debt.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a hospital chargemaster?
A chargemaster is a hospital’s comprehensive list of prices for every billable item and service. These prices are set internally by the hospital and are not negotiated with patients. While insured patients typically pay rates negotiated between their insurer and the hospital, uninsured or out-of-network patients can be billed at full chargemaster rates, which studies have shown can be many times higher than the actual cost of delivering care.
How much do hospitals mark up CT scans compared to Medicare rates?
According to a 2016 Health Affairs study, CT scan departments have the highest charge-to-cost ratio of any hospital department at 28.5 times cost. A 2021 Johns Hopkins study found that hospital prices for head CT scans without contrast were 5.9 times the Medicare rate even at negotiated commercial insurance rates. In the Vidant Health lawsuit, specific CT scan charges ranged from 11 to nearly 16 times the Medicare reimbursement rate.
Who is most affected by chargemaster pricing?
Uninsured patients bear the greatest burden because they have no insurer negotiating on their behalf and can be billed the full chargemaster price. Underinsured patients with high-deductible health plans are also significantly affected, as their out-of-pocket costs may be calculated based on chargemaster rates. Patients who receive emergency care at out-of-network hospitals face similar exposure, though the No Surprises Act has provided some protections for emergency services since January 2022.
Can I negotiate a hospital bill based on chargemaster pricing?
Yes. Hospitals regularly accept payments below chargemaster rates, particularly from uninsured patients. Request an itemized bill, compare the charges to Medicare reimbursement rates for the same procedure codes, and ask about the hospital’s financial assistance or charity care programs. Many hospitals will reduce bills significantly rather than pursue collections, especially when patients can demonstrate that the charges far exceed both Medicare rates and the hospital’s actual costs.
What is the status of the Vidant Health class action lawsuit?
The lawsuit was filed on February 18, 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina by the law firm Wallace and Graham on behalf of plaintiff George Cansler. The case challenges the hospital system’s chargemaster pricing and debt collection practices. Patients who received care at Vidant (now ECU Health) facilities and believe they were subjected to excessive billing should consult with a healthcare billing attorney for the latest case developments.
You Might Also Like
- Surprise Medical Billing Class Action — Hospital Network Sues Insurer Over No Surprises Act
- Class Action Targets Humana Military Over Mental Health Claim Denials in TRICARE East Region
- Is A Gas Price Class Action Against Trump Even Possible Under U.S. Law