The CAVU eCommerce Airport Parking Class Action resulted in a $425,000 settlement to compensate California residents who were charged hidden service fees at checkout when booking parking through AirportParkingreservations.com and AirportParking.com. If you made a reservation on either of these CAVU-operated websites between July 1, 2024 and March 10, 2025 and paid mandatory service charges that weren’t clearly disclosed upfront, you may be eligible for compensation.
Hidden fees were added at the final stage of checkout after customers had already proceeded through multiple screens showing only the advertised parking rate. For example, one plaintiff booked parking at the advertised rate of $14.95 per day in July 2024, only to have an additional $6.99 service fee added after clicking through four checkout screens. This practice, known as “drip pricing,” violates California’s Honest Pricing Law, which requires that material charges be disclosed prominently and upfront, not buried at the end of the transaction.
Table of Contents
- How CAVU Used Drip Pricing to Hide Service Charges at Checkout
- California’s Honest Pricing Law and What Makes This Practice Illegal
- Who Was Affected by CAVU’s Hidden Service Fees Between July 2024 and March 2025
- How the $425,000 Settlement Distributes Compensation to Class Members
- Eligibility Requirements and Important Deadlines You Cannot Miss
- How to File Your Claim and What Information You’ll Need
- What Changes CAVU Must Make to Comply with California Law Going Forward
How CAVU Used Drip Pricing to Hide Service Charges at Checkout
CAVU eCommerce deliberately structured their checkout process to separate the advertised parking rate from service charges that appeared only at the final stage. The company showed customers the base daily rate ($14.95 in the documented example) across multiple checkout screens, conditioning customers to accept that price before revealing the service fee at the last moment. By this stage, customers had invested time in the booking process and were psychologically committed to completing the transaction, making them less likely to abandon their purchase.
This technique is specifically prohibited under California law because it deceives consumers about the true total cost of the service. The state’s Honest Pricing Law requires that all mandatory charges be included in the initial advertised price or clearly and conspicuously disclosed before customers commit to the purchase. CAVU’s practice of showing the base rate first, then adding fees only at checkout, creates what regulators call “negative surprise”—a situation where consumers discover hidden costs too late to make an informed decision. The settlement acknowledges that this practice harmed consumers who were not provided with the clear pricing information necessary to shop effectively and compare CAVU’s rates against other parking services.

California’s Honest Pricing Law and What Makes This Practice Illegal
California’s Honest Pricing Law exists because consumers have a right to know the total cost of goods and services before committing to purchase. The law applies across all industries and specifically prohibits “drip pricing”—the practice of hiding mandatory fees, charges, or taxes until late in the purchase process. CAVU’s conduct violated this law by not including service charges in the advertised price shown on initial search results and product pages, and by not clearly disclosing them before customers clicked to purchase.
However, if CAVU’s service charges had been clearly labeled before the final checkout screen, the company might have argued they were following the law’s requirements. The difference between a compliant disclosure and an illegal one is conspicuousness—the charge must be disclosed early enough and prominently enough that a reasonable consumer would notice it before committing. In CAVU’s case, the structure of their checkout process ensured that charges appeared only after multiple decision points had already occurred. This is why the settlement includes injunctive relief requiring CAVU to reform its pricing practices and clearly disclose all charges upfront in compliance with California law.
Who Was Affected by CAVU’s Hidden Service Fees Between July 2024 and March 2025
The class period for this settlement runs from July 1, 2024 through March 10, 2025, meaning eligible consumers are those who made reservations on either AirportParkingreservations.com or AirportParking.com during this window and were charged mandatory service fees. The lawsuit was brought by California residents, so eligibility is limited to people who made reservations while residing in California. The documented example involved a July 2024 reservation, which falls squarely within this window.
The settlement covers anyone who paid the service charge during the class period, regardless of how much they paid or which airport they were parking at. Some people may have been charged once for a single reservation, while others may have made multiple bookings and accumulated service charges across several transactions. The pro-rata distribution system used for payouts means that people who paid higher total service fees will receive larger payments, but everyone with a qualifying charge gets compensated according to their share of the total fees paid.

How the $425,000 Settlement Distributes Compensation to Class Members
The $425,000 settlement fund is divided among three categories: individual class member payments, attorney fees, and administrative costs including settlement processing and court-approved representative awards. The exact amount each person receives depends on how much they paid in service charges during the class period relative to the total paid by all class members combined. If the total eligible charges were $100,000 and you paid $50 in service fees, your share would be calculated proportionally.
For example, if attorneys and administrators collectively receive $170,000 from the settlement (a typical range in such cases), approximately $255,000 remains for class member distributions. If total eligible service fees claimed come to $100,000, you would receive roughly $1.27 for every dollar in service fees you paid. The key tradeoff is that individual payments are typically modest in settlements like this because the recovery is spread across all affected consumers. However, the settlement also includes important injunctive relief requiring CAVU to change its pricing practices, which benefits future customers even if individual current payouts are small.
Eligibility Requirements and Important Deadlines You Cannot Miss
To qualify for compensation, you must have made a reservation on AirportParkingreservations.com or AirportParking.com between July 1, 2024 and March 10, 2025, been charged a mandatory service fee at checkout, and been a California resident at the time of the reservation. You also must submit your claim by January 15, 2026—either online or postmarked by this date. Missing this deadline disqualifies you from compensation entirely; there are no extensions based on circumstances like being out of town or not receiving notice.
If you’re uncertain whether a specific parking reservation qualifies, look for a booking confirmation email that shows the base parking rate separately from a service charge. Reservations made before July 1, 2024 or after March 10, 2025 are not eligible, even if you made them on the same website. A critical limitation of this settlement is that it only covers California residents; if you lived in another state when you made the reservation, you cannot claim compensation even if you used the affected websites. The final court approval date of December 1, 2025 has already passed, so the settlement is now in the distribution phase, and payments are expected to begin in February 2026.

How to File Your Claim and What Information You’ll Need
Filing a claim requires visiting the official settlement website at cavuservicechargesettlement.com and submitting your information online. You’ll need to provide proof of your service charges, which can typically come from your booking confirmation email or credit card statement showing the transaction. The website guides you through the process of entering the reservation date, the amount charged, and your personal information for payment.
Most claims can be filed within 15-20 minutes if you have the documentation readily available. Important warning: Do not use third-party claim filing services that charge fees to submit your claim for you. The settlement administrator processes claims for free, and any service claiming to charge you money to file is either a scam or an unnecessary intermediary taking a portion of your recovery. Additionally, verify that you’re visiting the official settlement site (cavuservicechargesettlement.com) rather than other websites claiming to help with this claim, as some sites may have outdated information or links to fraudulent claim portals.
What Changes CAVU Must Make to Comply with California Law Going Forward
As part of the settlement, CAVU eCommerce is required to implement injunctive relief that fundamentally changes how it discloses pricing on AirportParkingreservations.com and AirportParking.com. The company must now clearly and conspicuously disclose all mandatory service charges in the initial advertised price or display them prominently before customers click to purchase. This means service fees can no longer appear solely at the final checkout screen—they must be visible when customers first see the parking rate.
This settlement sets an important precedent for the airport parking industry, where similar drip pricing practices have been common across multiple service providers. While CAVU must now comply, consumers should remain cautious when booking parking on other websites and always verify the total cost before confirming any transaction. Regulatory enforcement of pricing transparency laws is increasing, and consumers who encounter similar hidden fee practices on other platforms can report them to California’s Attorney General.
